Sorry everyone, I've received some comments that were not so nice, so I have decided to start monitoring the comments on the blog. If your comment is constructive, does not call ANYONE names, and is not hateful, threatening, violent, or downright awful, it will be posted.
I realize that there is a lot of emotion flying around, and it's because of that emotion, that I don't want us to stoop to a level of calling ANYONE names, making threats, being hateful, violent, or just plain mean.
I'm sure most of you will understand and agree with this decision. I'm sorry for anyone who doesn't agree, it's the way it has to be if we are to protect our rights of free speech.
If you choose to make a comment, please keep the following in mind: Do unto others, as you would have them do unto you.
Thank you!
Saturday, October 6, 2012
Friday, October 5, 2012
Attacking Another Victim's Family
This time, Chelsea Hoffman has attacked a man, Paul Pattison, who was accidentally run over by his own car, just a few days ago, while trying to make some repairs to it. You can find the story HERE.
The reason for this attack, is because a woman (we will call her Diane to protect her privacy), a relative of Paul, and a friend of the Woods' family, stood up to Hoffman while Hoffman was; and has continued, to make attacks on the Hill/Woods' families.
Here is what Hoffman wrote concerning the family of Diane:
As you can clearly see, Hoffman states that it is "dumbass shit" and "idiotic" that this man was run over by his own vehicle. The car Paul was driving stalled in the middle of a very busy road, while his 3 young boys were in the car. When Paul exited the car to move it out of the way and to repair it, he apparently forgot to put the car in park. One of Paul’s children climbed into the driver’s seat and put the car into park when he noticed something was wrong.
Paul is in critical condition, has endured multiple surgeries, and still has a long way to recovery. Don’t you think the family has enough to deal with? Shouldn’t the emphasis of this story be on the fact that this man survived this tragic accident? Shouldn’t we be telling the world that this man’s son is a hero? Why does Hoffman feel the need to call people names?
Not only has Hoffman attacked Diane in the recent past for sticking up for the Hill/Woods' family, Hoffman is now attacking Diane's family as well.
The following posts were made to Diane while standing up for the Hill/Wood's family.
Now Diane needs some standing up of her own, and the Hill/Woods' family WILL be there to back her up every step of the way!!
In her "article", Hoffman questions whether Pattison was drunk or under the influence. A portion of that "article" is posted below.
What an awful thing to say about someone you don't know! I don't see what having money to get the vehicle fixed has to do with anything either. The man's car stalled in the middle of the road, you do what you have to do, especially with children in the car! My BRAND NEW car has stalled out before, let alone a used car or older car. I'm sure if Pattison thought the car was a danger to his children, he wouldn't have allowed them in the vehicle.
On Hoffman's Facebook page, she refers to Pattison as an "idiot" who managed to run himself over, and a "fucktard". Somehow, with that language, I highly doubt that she sympathizes with the family and the children involved in this horrendous ordeal, which because of Hoffman, has now gotten worse!
The reason for this attack, is because a woman (we will call her Diane to protect her privacy), a relative of Paul, and a friend of the Woods' family, stood up to Hoffman while Hoffman was; and has continued, to make attacks on the Hill/Woods' families.
Here is what Hoffman wrote concerning the family of Diane:
Paul is in critical condition, has endured multiple surgeries, and still has a long way to recovery. Don’t you think the family has enough to deal with? Shouldn’t the emphasis of this story be on the fact that this man survived this tragic accident? Shouldn’t we be telling the world that this man’s son is a hero? Why does Hoffman feel the need to call people names?
Not only has Hoffman attacked Diane in the recent past for sticking up for the Hill/Woods' family, Hoffman is now attacking Diane's family as well.
The following posts were made to Diane while standing up for the Hill/Wood's family.
Now Diane needs some standing up of her own, and the Hill/Woods' family WILL be there to back her up every step of the way!!
In her "article", Hoffman questions whether Pattison was drunk or under the influence. A portion of that "article" is posted below.
What an awful thing to say about someone you don't know! I don't see what having money to get the vehicle fixed has to do with anything either. The man's car stalled in the middle of the road, you do what you have to do, especially with children in the car! My BRAND NEW car has stalled out before, let alone a used car or older car. I'm sure if Pattison thought the car was a danger to his children, he wouldn't have allowed them in the vehicle.
On Hoffman's Facebook page, she refers to Pattison as an "idiot" who managed to run himself over, and a "fucktard". Somehow, with that language, I highly doubt that she sympathizes with the family and the children involved in this horrendous ordeal, which because of Hoffman, has now gotten worse!
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Really....It's That Funny Huh?!
It has been brought to my attention, that the Facebook page connected to this blog has been removed as of 11 p.m. October 2.
They will be contacting Facebook to see what violations took place. Apparently Chelsea thought it was quite funny, since this was her response to the page going down.
I will keep this blog updated on anything else that I find out.
Copyright Infringement and Fair Use
It seems that even though Facebook removed a photo that Chelsea Hoffman had of Dana Woods, she still believes that she can use that photo.
There is no reason for Chelsea to continue posting pictures of these two women , not even to start a discussion. There is no cold case, their killers are behind bars, and the families are simply trying to move on and mourn the loss of their loved ones. Unfortunately, Chelsea will not allow the families to do that, because she keeps posting their photo to harass one of the families.
This photo below is copyrighted per Creative Commons and is not allowed for use for any commercial purposes. Chelsea's Facebook page is linked to her .com site where she took donations, sells merchandise, and has links to her gather.com page, in which she receives payment for every click she gets on an article of hers. This means that the photo that she continues to post is in fact copyright infringement.
According to Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Fair Use Law there are 4 factors to be considered in whether or not a particular use of a copyright is fair.
1) The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes.
Since Chelsea's Facebook page is linked to other websites that compensate her for her work, it is not for educational or non-profit purposes, but instead it is for her commercial gain.
2) The nature of the copyrighted work
Chelsea says: "the photo is for educational purposes as per the exceptions highlighted in U.S. copyright and fair use laws".
The original use of the photo was to help spread awareness while the women were missing. The nature of this copyrighted work is no longer what it is being used for. It is not being used to harass the families of the women in the photo.
3) The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
Chelsea used the entire image, not just a portion of the image, whether it is a screen shot or not, the entire image continues to be used.
4) The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work.
The copyright owner has explicitly expressed through reporting Chelsea on Facebook, that the photo needs to be removed.
There is no reason for Chelsea to continue posting pictures of these two women , not even to start a discussion. There is no cold case, their killers are behind bars, and the families are simply trying to move on and mourn the loss of their loved ones. Unfortunately, Chelsea will not allow the families to do that, because she keeps posting their photo to harass one of the families.
This photo below is copyrighted per Creative Commons and is not allowed for use for any commercial purposes. Chelsea's Facebook page is linked to her .com site where she took donations, sells merchandise, and has links to her gather.com page, in which she receives payment for every click she gets on an article of hers. This means that the photo that she continues to post is in fact copyright infringement.
According to Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Fair Use Law there are 4 factors to be considered in whether or not a particular use of a copyright is fair.
1) The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes.
Since Chelsea's Facebook page is linked to other websites that compensate her for her work, it is not for educational or non-profit purposes, but instead it is for her commercial gain.
2) The nature of the copyrighted work
Chelsea says: "the photo is for educational purposes as per the exceptions highlighted in U.S. copyright and fair use laws".
The original use of the photo was to help spread awareness while the women were missing. The nature of this copyrighted work is no longer what it is being used for. It is not being used to harass the families of the women in the photo.
3) The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
Chelsea used the entire image, not just a portion of the image, whether it is a screen shot or not, the entire image continues to be used.
4) The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work.
The copyright owner has explicitly expressed through reporting Chelsea on Facebook, that the photo needs to be removed.
How would you feel if you saw someone making a $ off of your deceased loved one?
Houston, we have contact!!
The following is a message received via "The Real Chelsea Hoffman Exposed" Facebook page. It has been posted on the Facebook pages wall.
The message below came from Chelsea Hoffman, and has not been altered in ANY way. The typos are hers, not mine.
__________________________________________
This page has been reported for spoofing/posing as Chelsea Hoffman as well as credible threats of violence which is a felony and punishable by prison time if pursued by the victim.
Furthermore I have turned the details of this page in to my attorney as well as to law enforcement in South Carolina, as well as screenshots of my address posted and the threats of violence made by members of this site.
I will be pressing criminal charges and I will be suing for slander with malicious intent since some of thedetails of this site and the blog shared by this FB page are photoshopped and false posts about me.
________________________________________________________________________________
The first thing that I want to say about this message, is that in NO WAY is the Facebook page or this blog trying to pose as Chelsea Hoffman. If that were the case, we wouldn't have such negative page names, and titles:
i.e.: downwithchelseahoffman@hotmail.com or Chelsea Hoffman Exposed or Justice for the Families Affected by Chelsea Hoffman.
Secondly, I don't know what the law in South Carolina is going to do, since neither the Facebook page or this blog is run by anyone who lives there. Also, your address is public information, so you can just get over that one. No threats of violence have been made either. So, yeah.
Third, good luck pressing criminal charges for slander. Apparently you haven't educated yourself enough to know that slander means something spoken, and since this is all on the Internet and is written out, than you must know that it would be libel instead. Use a dictionary sometime.
Oh and by the way Chelsea, according to the same definition of libel above, it states the following "Libel against the reputation of a person who has died will allow surviving members of the family to bring an action for damages. Most states provide for a party defamed by a periodical to demand a published retraction".
Monday, October 1, 2012
Feeling a Little Scared?
It appears that Chelsea Hoffman is feeling a bit scared these days and has the need to protect herself physically. I can guarantee that if anyone is after her physically, it isn't anyone I know.
Chelsea made the following posts on her Facebook page today:
Also, it seems that Chelsea Hoffman thinks that my blog is less than favorable, poorly designed, and doesn't hold up to her own standards of hating on people. For that, I apologize Chelsea. I will try harder to point out your wrong doings from now on and try to be a little meaner about it.
Oh and by the way Chelsea, and my readers, nothing on this blog has been photo-shopped, so yeah, you must be talking about another blog that is writing bad things about you as well. If you (my readers) want to see the whole print-screen, please send me an email.
Chelsea made the following posts on her Facebook page today:
Also, it seems that Chelsea Hoffman thinks that my blog is less than favorable, poorly designed, and doesn't hold up to her own standards of hating on people. For that, I apologize Chelsea. I will try harder to point out your wrong doings from now on and try to be a little meaner about it.
Oh and by the way Chelsea, and my readers, nothing on this blog has been photo-shopped, so yeah, you must be talking about another blog that is writing bad things about you as well. If you (my readers) want to see the whole print-screen, please send me an email.
I'm Not Pulling This Stuff From My Butt!
So the other day, I set up a Google Alert, one for myself (not going to reveal that one, sorry), one for the Chelsea Hoffman Exposed Facebook Page, one on Chelsea Hoffman, and a few others.
The proof is in the pudding people. I'm seriously not pulling this stuff from my butt. Here are a few other recent examples of what Chelsea is doing.
Make sure to not only read the articles, but the comments themselves. These comments are mostly from people who have are personally affected by her writing.
Oh, and by the way, these other articles, are being written by other Gather.com members!
The proof is in the pudding people. I'm seriously not pulling this stuff from my butt. Here are a few other recent examples of what Chelsea is doing.
Make sure to not only read the articles, but the comments themselves. These comments are mostly from people who have are personally affected by her writing.
Oh, and by the way, these other articles, are being written by other Gather.com members!
Response to Chelsea Hoffman's "Did Rajwinder Kaur Join a Cult?"
Response to Chelsea Hoffman's "Is Rajwinder Kaur Dead or is this a Hoax?"
While I do realize that 3 of these links were written by the same person, it is still a PRIME example of what Chelsea is doing to these poor families who are already hurting so badly.
This needs to STOP!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)